REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
EVENT
California Institute
of Technology
Pasadena, California
11:00 A.M. PST
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you so much. Dr. Moore, President
Baltimore; to the faculty
and students at Cal Tech, and to people
involved in NASA's JPL out
here. I want to thank Representatives
Dreier, Baca and Millender-McDonald
for coming with me today, and for
the work they do in your behalf
back in Washington. I want to thank
three members of our Science
and Technology team for being here -- my
Science Advisor Neal Lane;
Dr. Rita Colwell, the NSF Director; and my
good friend, the Secretary
of Energy, Bill Richardson, who has done a
great job with our national
labs to keep them being innovators in fields
from computational science
to environmental technology.
One person who would have liked to have been here today and I
can tell you thinks that he
would be a better representative of our
administration on this topic
is the Vice President. When we took office
together, the fact that I
was challenged scientifically and
technologically was standing
joke. (Laughter.) And he wants all of you
to know that he's campaigning
all over the country with a Palm 7 on his
hip. (Laughter.)
He wants you to know that he loves science and technology so
much, he's not even angry
that Cal Tech beat out Harvard for top spot in
the U.S. News rankings this
year. (Laughter.) I think it has something
to do with the relative electoral
votes of California and Massachusetts.
(Laughter.)
But before I came out here I told Dr. Moore and Dr. Baltimore
that it was a real thrill
for me to meet Dr. Moore, that even I knew
what Moore's Law was; and
that before the Vice President became
otherwise occupied, we used
to have weekly lunches and I'd talked to him
about politics and he'd give
me lectures about climate change.
(Laughter.)
But we once got into this hilarious conversation about the
practical applications of
Moore's Law, like it explains why every cable
network can double the number
of talk shows every year that no one wants
to listen to. (Laughter.)
And so it's a real thrill for me to be here.
(Laughter.)
Actually, I come with some trepidation. An eight-year-old
child met me at the airport,
and she and her brother came with their
father, who is a friend of
mine, and she brought me a letter from her
third grade class. And
the letter had all these questions: What was
your favorite book when you
were in the third grade? What did you
collect then? What do
you collect now? And one of the questions was,
are you ever nervous when
you're speaking before large audiences.
And the answer -- and I was writing all these answers so we
could type up a letter --
I said, not usually. But I mean, I'm sort of
nervous here today.
(Laughter.) And I told somebody I was nervous, one
of the wags back at the White
House with a sense of humor, and he said,
well, you know the Einstein
millennial story, don't you -- trying to
help me get unnervous.
(Laughter.) I said, so I said, no -- you always
learn to be patient in the
face of other people's jokes. It's one of
the great social skills that
an American can develop. (Laughter.)
So I said, no. And he said, well, God decides to give America
a millennial gift, and the
gift is to send Einstein back to Earth for a
few days to talk to ordinary
folks, because he was the greatest brain of
the last millennium.
And they have the first meeting in a nice little
hall like this. And
it's absolutely packed, and these three big, burly
guys push their way to the
front, shoving everyone else to the side. So
Einstein politely takes them
first and he says to the first guy, well,
what's your IQ, young man?
And he said 240. He said wonderful, let's
talk about how I thought up
the theory of relativity. And they have a
terrific conversation.
The second guy, he says, what's your IQ? He said, 140. He
said, let's talk about globalization
and its impact on climate change.
And they had a terrific conversation.
And the third guy kind of hung
his head, and he said, what's
your IQ? And he said, 40. And Einstein
said, oh, don't worry.
You can always go into politics. (Laughter.)
I want you to know, though, in preparation for this day I've
been spending a lot of time
trying to get in touch with my inner nerd.
(Laughter and applause.)
And my wife helped me, because she's been
having these Millennium Lectures
at the White House to discuss big
things. And the other
night, she had Vince Cerf, who was one of the
founders of the Internet,
and Eric Lander, who's helped to develop many
of the tools of modern genome
research. And that really got me
thinking, and I want to say
some more serious things about that in a
moment. And then my
staff challenged me to actually order Christmas
gifts over the Internet.
And I did that. And while doing that, I
learned that with just a click
of a mouse, I could actually order -- and
I did this, I'm embarrassed
to say -- I ordered Arkansas smoked ham and
sausage delivered to my door.
(Laughter.) So I think the 21st century
has more for me than I had
originally thought. (Laughter.)
As all of you know, Albert Einstein spent a lot of time here
at Cal Tech in the 1930s.
And three weeks ago, Time Magazine crowned
him the Person of the Century.
The fact that he won this honor over
people like Franklin Roosevelt
and Mohandas Gandhi is not only an
incredible testament to the
quantum leaps in knowledge that he achieved
for all humanity, but also
for the 20th century's earth-shaking advances
in science and technology.
Just as an aside, I'd like to say because we're here at Cal
Tech, Einstein's contributions
remind us of how greatly American science
and technology and, therefore,
American society have benefitted and
continue to benefit from the
extraordinary gifts of scientists and
engineers who are born in
other countries, and we should continue to
welcome them to our shores.
(Applause.)
But the reason so many of you live, work and study here is
that there are so many more
questions yet to be answered: How does the
brain actually produce the
phenomenon of consciousness? How do we
translate insights from neuroscience
into more productive learning
environments for all our children?
Why do we age -- the question I
ponder more and more these
days. (Laughter.) I looked at a picture of
myself when I was inaugurated
the first time the other day, and it
scared me to death.
(Laughter.) And so I wonder, is this
preprogrammed, or wear and
tear? Are we alone in the universe? What
causes gamma ray bursts?
What makes up the missing mass of the
universe? What's in
those black holes, anyway? And maybe the biggest
question of all: How
in the wide world can you add $3 billion in market
capitalization simply by adding
.com to the end of a name? (Laughter.)
You will find the answers to the serious questions I posed and
to many others. It was
this brilliant Cal Tech community that first
located genes on chromosomes
and unlocked the secrets of chemical bonds
and quarks. You were
the propulsive force behind jet flight and built
America's first satellites.
You made it possible for us to manufacture
microchips of ever-increasing
complexity and gave us our first guided
tour on the surface of Mars.
With your new gravitational wave
observatory, you will open
an entirely new window on the mysteries of
the universe, observing the
propagating ripples which Einstein predicted
84 years ago.
Today, I came here to thank you for all you're doing to
advance the march of human
knowledge and to announce what we intend to
do to accelerate that march
by greatly increasing our national
investments in science and
technology.
The budget I will submit to Congress in just a few days will
include a $2.8 billion increase
in our 21st century research fund. This
will support a $1 billion
increase in biomedical research for the
National Institutes of Health;
$675 million, which is double the
previous largest dollar increase
for the National Science Foundation in
its entire 50-year history;
and major funding increases in areas from
information technology to
space exploration to the development of
cleaner sources of energy.
This budget makes research at our nation's universities a top
priority, with an increase
in funding of more than $1 billion.
University-based research
provides the kind of fundamental insights that
are most important in any
new technology or treatment. It helps to
produce the next generation
of scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs.
And we intend to give university-based
research a major lift.
The budget supports increases not only in biomedical research,
but also in all scientific
and engineering fields. As you know,
advances in one field are
often dependent on breakthroughs in other
disciplines. For example,
advances in computer science are helping us
to develop drugs more rapidly,
and to move from sequencing the human
genome to better understanding
the functions of individual genes.
My budget supports a major new national nanotechnology
initiative worth $500 million.
Cal Tech is no stranger to the idea of
nanotechnology, the ability
to manipulate matter at the atomic and
molecular level. Over
40 years ago, Cal Tech's own Richard Symonds
asked, what would happen if
we could arrange the atoms one by one the
way we want them? Well,
you can see one example of this in this sign
behind me, that Dr. Lane furnished
for Cal Tech to hang as the backdrop
for this speech. It's
the Western hemisphere in gold atoms. But I
think you will find more enduring
uses for nanotechnology.
Just imagine, materials with 10 times the strength of steel
and only a fraction of the
weight; shrinking all the information at the
Library of Congress into a
device the size of a sugar cube; detecting
cancerous tumors that are
only a few cells in size. Some of these
research goals will take 20
or more years to achieve. But that is why
-- precisely why -- as Dr.
Baltimore said, there is such a critical role
for the federal government.
As I announced yesterday, this budget also includes an
historic initiative to make
higher education more affordable. I am well
aware of the fact that I would
not have become President of the United
States without loans and grants
and jobs that helped me get through
college and law school; and
that more and more, given the cost of higher
education, a higher and higher
percentage of our students need more of
all those things. This
has been a virtual obsession for me ever since I
became President. I
was determined to leave office saying we had opened
the doors of college to all
Americans.
We have come a long way, by changing the student loan program
to make it less expensive
and to give young people more options for
paying off their loans, including
as a percentage of their income when
they leave school. We've
increased the number of work-study grants from
$700,000 to $1 million.
We've dramatically increased the Pell Grant
program, and the HOPE Scholarship
tax credit and the Lifetime Learning
tax credits we adopted in
1997 last year alone had almost 5 million
beneficiaries in institutions
of higher education in the United States.
(Applause.)
Yesterday, I proposed that, for the first time, we make
college tuition tax deductible,
and that we do it in a way that would
benefit even more people on
more modest incomes so that they could get
the same 28-percent benefit,
even if they're in the 15-percent tax
category. I think this
is very important. (Applause.)
The budget contains another increase in Pell grants, special
initiatives to help minority
students get into science and engineering
and graduate. (Applause.)
Special efforts -- that is basically a test
program for several thousand
students now -- to try to do something
about the extraordinarily
high dropout rate from college.
Now, over two-thirds of the high school graduates are actually
going to go into college this
year. That's an increase of over 10
percent in the last seven
years. That's quite a large increase in a
short time. But the
dropout rate has increased correspondingly. We
want to know why. Is
it for financial reasons? Is it because people
weren't prepared? Could
they all be just idiosyncratic personal
reasons? And we intend
to do everything we can with a very large test
group to see what we can do
to turn this situation around.
And, finally, we're going to double the size of our Gear-Up
program to 1.4 million young
people. That's the program where people in
universities and college all
across America mentor middle-school kids
who are at risk to try to
help them develop the skills and the belief
that they can go to college,
and simultaneously to tell them and their
parents exactly what they
can expect in the way of aid under current law
if they do go, so they will
know. Many people still don't know that the
barriers to their going on
to college have been removed. So I hope you
will also support this part
of our budget, because the young people of
our country and their families
need it.
In addition to announcing our new research budget and our
efforts to make colleges more
affordable, I'd like to try to achieve one
other mission here today.
First, I want to take a step back to
acknowledge that we have not
done a good enough job in helping all
Americans to understand why
we need very, very large investment in
science and technology.
Far too many of our citizens think science is something done
by men and women who are in
white lab coats behind closed doors that
somehow leads to satellite
TV and Dolly the sheep. And it's all a
mystery. It is our responsibility
to open the world of science to more
of our fellow citizens; to
help them understand the great questions
science is seeking to answer
and to help them see how those answers will
actually affect their lives
and their children's lives in profoundly
important and positive ways.
First, we have to make sure Americans understand the
contributions science and
technology are making right now to the present
level of economic growth,
something Dr. Baltimore referred to. For
example, because of our early
investments in the Internet, America now
leads the world in information
technology, an industry that now accounts
for a third of our economic
growth, although only 8 percent of our work
force; that generates jobs
that pay 80 percent more than the private
sector average.
If you look at that -- what does that mean to ordinary people,
and what does it mean to the
nature of the economy we're living in? I
have never told the American
people that we had repealed the ordinary
laws of supply and demand,
or the business cycle. But we have stretched
them quite a lot.
In February, next month, we will have the longest economic
expansion in the history of
the United States -- outstripping even those
that required full mobilization
for war. Now, part of that is because
we have pursued, I believe,
sound policies -- to get rid of the deficit;
to start running surpluses,
the first back-to-back surpluses in 42
years; to keep our markets
open, with 270 trade agreements; to argue, as
I have, that not only exports
are benefited by open markets, we also
benefit from the imports,
because they're a powerful brake on inflation
and allow us to continue to
grow.
But the real reason this thing keeps going on and on and on is
that -- all we did in the
government was to set the conditions, and
provide the tools, for the
American people to succeed. The real reason
is the exponential growth
in information technology, and how it is
rifling through every other
sector of our economy and reinforcing the
material science revolution,
which proceeded it by a few years, but
which continues to the present
day.
When I became President, there were only 50 sites on the
Worldwide Web -- 50.
When I became President -- that seemed like a long
time ago to the students,
but the rest of you will know -- (laughter) --
it's just like yesterday.
There are now over 50 million. Think of it.
In seven years, from 50 to
over 50 million. It is changing everything
about the way we work and
live and relate to each other.
I was in Northern California a few weeks ago with a lot of
really fascinating young people
who work with E-bay -- a lot of you have
probably bought things, maybe
you've even sold things on E-bay. But for
example, one of the things
I learned is that in addition to the
employees of E-bay, there
are now 20,000 people whose primary source of
income is buying and selling
on E-bay. They do it for a living. And
several of them -- not insubstantial
number of them -- were on welfare
before they found a way to
bring their entrepreneurial skills to bare by
trading on E-bay. It
has changed everything.
So we have to say to people, if you like the fact that we have
the lowest unemployment and
welfare rolls in 30 years, the lowest
minority unemployment rates
ever recorded, the lowest female
unemployment rate in 40 years,
the lowest poverty rates in 20 years, the
lowest single household poverty
rate in 46 years, you have to understand
that all that, at least in
large part, is because of the ability of the
discoveries of science and
technology to rifle through our ordinary
lives. And it is very,
very important that all of us do a better job of
that.
I have proposed in this budget a 36 percent increase in
information technology research
alone, so that researchers will be able
to tackle a wide array of
other challenges. How do we find, precisely,
the piece of information we're
looking for in an ever-larger ocean of
raw data. How do we
design computers that are usable by everyone
including people with disabilities.
One of the most fascinating relationships I've developed -- we
were talking on the plane
ride out here about one of the great things
about being President is nearly
anybody will come to talk to you --
once, anyway. (Laughter.)
And we were talking about all the people I
had been privileged to meet
in the last seven years. You know, I have
developed quite a good personal
friendship with Steven Hawking, who, as
all of you know, has lived
longer with Lou Gehrig's disease, as far as
we know, than any person who's
ever lived -- partly, I am convinced,
because of not only the size
of his brain, but the size of his heart.
But it is fascinating to see
what technology has permitted this man to
do.
Just a few years ago, he could have had the biggest brain in
the world, and no one could
have known it, because it could not have
gotten out. There is
no speaking capacity, almost no movement left. He
can just move his thumb, and
hold in his hand this remarkable little
tracer that goes through a
whole dictionary of words that he has, that
he runs through with rapid
speed. He picks the word he wants, puts the
sentences together, and then
an automated voice tells you what he just
said.
How can we make it even easier for him? How can we make it
even easier for other people?
This will be a huge issue. Make no
mistake about it, the liberation
of Americans with disabilities is also
in no small measure the product
of the revolution in science and
technology.
There are also other uses. I read the other day that
manufacturers are soon going
to introduce a refrigerator that can scan
the bar codes of empty packages
and expired goods -- (laughter) -- and
order new groceries for you
over the Internet. (Laughter.) Now,
everybody who's ever poured
out a carton of bad milk will love this.
(Laughter.) You don't
have to smell your bad milk anymore. It won't be
long before the computer will
refuse to order what's bad for you --
(laughter) -- and only pick
items off Dean Ornish's diet. And then
we'll all be in great shape.
(Laughter.)
The second thing I think we have to do is let Americans know
how investments in science
and technology, broadly stated, will allow us
to lead longer, healthier
lives. Everybody knows now that you can put
money into cancer research
-- and thank God we've discovered two of the
genes that are high predictors
of breast cancer, for example, in the
last couple of years -- but
we need for more Americans to understand why
we need a broad research agenda
in science and technology, for the
health of Americans.
(Applause.)
In the 20th century, American life expectancy went from 47
years to almost 77 years,
thanks to penicillin and vaccines for many
childhood diseases.
We were talking the other day about the impact --
I'm old enough to remember
the first polio vaccine. And I remember how
our mothers herded us in line
and made us stand there waiting for our
shot. And it was like
they were all holding their breath, praying and
hoping that we would get our
shot before we got polio. It's something
that young people today can
hardly imagine, but it hung like a cloud
over the families of my parents'
generation. Now, we have this
incredible life expectancy
-- today, the average American who lives to
be 65 has a life expectancy
of 83 -- already. And we are clearly on the
cusp of greater advances.
Later this year, researchers expect to finish the first
complete sequencing of the
genome -- all 3 billion letters and 80,000
genes that make up our DNA
code. Since so many diseases have a genetic
component, the completion
of this project will clearly lead to a
revolution in our ability
to detect, treat and prevent many diseases.
For example, patients with
some forms of leukemia and breast cancer soon
may receive sophisticated
new drugs that elegantly actually target the
precise cancer cells with
little or no risk to healthy cells. That will
change everything.
Our new trove of genomic data may even allow us to identify
and cure most genetic diseases
before a child is even born. Most people
just take it as a given now
that within the next few years, when young
mothers bring their babies
home from the hospital, they will bring along
a genetic map of their children's
makeup, what the problems are, what
the challenges are, what the
strengths are. It will be scary to some
extent, but it also plainly
will allow us to raise our children in a way
that will enhance the length
and quality of their lives.
But it's important to recognize that we never could have had
the revolution in the genome
project without the revolution in computer
science as well, that they
intersected. Research at the intersection
between biomedical research
and engineering will also lead to amazing
breakthroughs. Already,
scientists are working on -- we've seen it on
television now -- an artificial
retina to treat certain kinds of
blindness, and methods of
directly stimulating the spinal cord to allow
people who are paralyzed to
work. Now, you think of that.
Last year, for the first time, to give you an idea of the
impact of technology on traditional
medical research, last year, for the
first time, medical researchers
transplanted nerves from the limbs to
the spine of a laboratory
animal that had its spine severed and achieved
movement in the lower limbs
for the first time. That had never happened
before.
Now, because of advances in the intersection between science
and engineering, we may not
have to keep working on that. We may
actually be able to program
a chip that will stimulate the exact
movements that were prevented
by the severing or the injury of a spine.
And all the people that we
have seen hobbled by these terrible injuries
might be able to get up and
walk. Because there was medical research,
yes, but there was also research
on the engineering, nonbiological
components of this endeavor.
We have to do a better job of explaining
that to the American people.
Third, advances in science and technology are helping us to
preserve our environment in
ways that preserve more sustainable and
widespread economic growth.
And that is very important.
Let me just give you an example. Not far from here in
Southern California, a couple
years ago the Department of Energy,
working with the National
Homebuilders and HUD, helped to construct a
moderate- and low-income housing
community, with glass in the windows
that keeps out four or five
times as much heat or cold, and lets in even
more light. And that,
coupled with the latest insulation technology and
the latest lighting in the
house, enabled the houses to be marketed to
people of modest incomes,
with the promise that their electric bills
would average 40 percent below
what they would in a home of that size
built in the traditional manner.
I can tell you that after two years,
the power bills are averaging
65 percent less. And we can't build
enough houses for the people
that want them.
The Detroit Auto Show this year is showcasing cars that, I'm
proud to say, were developed
as part of our partnership for new
generation vehicles that the
Vice President headed up, and we started
way back in '93. We
brought in the auto workers and the auto companies
and we said, look, instead
of having a big fight about this, why don't
we work together and figure
out how to use technology to dramatically
increase mileage. And
a lot of you are probably familiar -- they're
using fuel-injection engines,
which cuts a lot of the greenhouse gas
emissions; some using developed
mixed-fuel cars that start on
electricity, switch to fuel
after you reach a certain stage, and then go
back to electricity when you
slow down back to that speed, because 70
percent of the greenhouse
gas emissions are used in starting and
stopping cars.
And there are all kinds of other things being developed. But
this year the Detroit Auto
Show has cars making 70, 80 miles a gallon,
that are four-seater cars,
that will be on the market in a couple of
years. You can buy Japanese
cars this year on the market that get about
70 miles to the gallon, but
they're small two-seaters. Last year I went
and saw cars that are 500
to 1,000 pounds lighter than traditional cars,
and score at least as well
on all the damage tests -- again because of
the revolution in material
science, with composite materials being used
in the cars.
And the big thing that's coming up in this area is, before you
know it, I believe we will
crack the chemical barriers to truly
efficient production of biomass
fuels. One of the reasons you see this
whole debate -- in the presidential
campaign, if you're following it,
you know the big argument
is, is it a waste of money to push ethanol or
not, if it takes seven gallons
of gasoline to make eight gallons of
ethanol. But they're
on the verge of a chemical breakthrough that is
analogous to what was done
when crude oil could be transferred
efficiently into gasoline.
And when that happens, you'll be able to
make eight gallons of biomass
-- not just from corn, but from weeds,
from rice hulls, from anything
-- for about one gallon of fuel. That
will be the equivalent therefore,
in environmental terms, of cars that
get hundreds of miles a gallon.
And the world, the environmental world,
will be changed forever.
And that's -- one-third of our greenhouse gas
emissions are in transportation.
Now, I just want to kind of go off the script a little to
hammer this home, because
big ideas in science matter. And once you
make a big breakthrough, then
thousands and thousands of things follow
that have immense practical
significance. But you must also know and
believe that being in the
grip of a big idea that is wrong can be
absolutely disastrous.
So today, in Washington and in much of the world, there is a
debate that goes something
like this: The overwhelming evidence of
science is that the climate
is warming at an unsustainable rate due to
human activity. And
then there's this old idea, which says, well,
that's really too bad, but
a country can't grow rich or stay rich and
sustain a middle-class lifestyle,
unless every year it puts more
greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere than it did the year before. And
you certainly can't drastically
cut them, and maintain your level of
wealth.
Our administration spent hundreds of thousands of dollars last
year complying with requests
to appear before a House subcommittee that
believes that our passion
about climate change is some sort of
subversive plot to wreck the
American economy. (Laughter.) Either that
or -- you know, I've been
reading too many kooky books or something.
(Laughter.) They think
it's just crazy. Why? Because they can't face
the fact that we would do
anything to hurt the American economy, and
they really believed it would.
So I would argue to you that here is a
place where we're in the grip
of an idea that is wrong.
Our efforts to get India and China and other big countries
that will soon surpass us
in greenhouse gas emissions to cooperate with
us, not in regulation, but
in new technologies, to help them grow rich
differently, always keep running
up against the barrier of suspicious
officials who believe somehow
this is kind of an American plot to keep
them poor. Why?
Because they're in the grip of an idea that isn't
right anymore. It is
simply not true that to grow rich, you have to put
more greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere.
So again, I say we have to do a better job of explaining the
contribution that science
and technology can make to saving the planet
and allowing us to still have
prosperous lives -- and, I would argue, to
allow us to have more prosperous
lives and better lives that would
otherwise be the case, certainly
within 40 to 50 years, if we don't act
and act now. This is
profoundly important. (Applause.)
Finally, I think we have to do a better job of having an open
debate about the responsibilities
that all these advances and
discoveries will clearly impose:
The same genetic revolution that can
offer new hope for millions
of Americans could also be used to deny
people health insurance; cloning
human beings; information technology
which helps to educate children
and provide telemedicine to rural
communities could also be
used to create disturbingly detailed profiles
of every move our citizens
make on line.
The federal government, I think, has a role to play in meeting
these challenges as well.
That's why we've put forward strict rules and
penalties to limit the use
and release of medical records; why we've
worked with Congress to ban
the cloning of human beings, while
preserving our ability to
use the morally and medically acceptable
applications of cloning technology,
which I believe are profoundly
important; why we're working
with the Internet industry to ensure that
consumers -- consumers --
have control over how their personal
information is used.
It's up to all of us to figure out how to use the new powers
that science and technology
give us in a responsible way. Just because
we can do something doesn't
mean we should. It is incumbent, therefore,
upon both scientists and public
servants to involve the public in a
great debate to ensure that
science serves humanity -- always -- and
never the other way around.
On this campus nearly 70 years ago, Albert Einstein said,
"Never forget this, in the
midst of your diagrams and equations:
concern for man himself and
his fate must always form the chief interest
of all technical endeavors."
Today, at the dawn of this new millennium,
we see for all of you, particularly
the young people in this audience,
an era of unparalleled promise
and possibility. Our relentless quest to
understand what we do not
yet know, which has defined Americans from our
beginnings, will have more
advances in the 21st century than at any
other time in history.
We must be wise as we advance.
I told you earlier that the First Lady sponsored a Millennium
Evening with Vince Cerf and
Professor Lander. One of the most
interesting things he said
about his genomic research confirmed not
other scientific research,
but the teachings of almost every religion in
the world. He said that,
genetically, we are 99.9 percent the same.
And, he said, furthermore,
that the genetic differences among
individuals within a given
racial or ethnic group are greater than the
differences between groups
as a whole -- suggesting that we are not only
our brothers' and sisters'
keepers, but in fundamental genetic ways, we
are our brothers and sisters.
And I leave you with this thought. I think the supreme irony
of our time is that I can
come here as President and have the high honor
of discussing these unfathomable
advances wrought by the human
intellect, that have occurred
and the even greater ones yet to occur, in
a world where the biggest
social problem is the oldest demon of human
society -- we are still afraid
of people who aren't like us. And fear
leads to distrust, and distrust
leads to dehumanization, and
dehumanization leads to violence.
And it is really quite interesting that the end of the Cold
War has marked an upsurge
in ethnic and racial and tribal and religious
hatred and conflict around
the world; and that even in our own country
we see countless examples
of hate crimes from people who believe that
others are different and,
therefore, to be distrusted and feared and
dehumanized.
You have the power to put science and technology at work
advancing the human condition
as never before. Always remember to keep
your values at the core of
what you do. And tell every one of your
fellow citizens, and indeed
people with whom you come in contact all
across the world, that every
single scientific advance confirms over and
over again the most important
facts of life -- our common humanity.
Thank you very much. (Applause.)
END
11:40 A.M. PST |