OMB COST ESTIMATE
FOR PAY-AS-YOU-GO CALCULATIONS

Report No: 493
Date: 10/27/99

  1. LAW NUMBER: P.L.106-65 (S. 1059)
  2. BILL TITLE: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000
  3. BILL PURPOSE: (1) Authorizes FY 2000 appropriations for Department of Defense (DOD) programs, Department of Energy national security programs, and the Maritime Administration; (2) modifies military pay and retirement benefits (3) reorganizes nuclear weapons activities of the Department of Energy (DOE); and (4) makes various amendments to national security programs.
  4. OMB ESTIMATE:
  5. (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars)
    1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
    Net costs..................... 0 -18 112 87 36 16

    P.L. 106-65 repeals the provision in current law that reduces retirement pay for military retirees employed in Federal civilian positions (re-employed annuitants), resulting in estimated additional outlays from the Military Retirement Trust Fund of approximately $74 million per year starting in FY 2000. The Act also reassigns certain spectrum frequencies that previously had been identified for auction to the Federal Government for use by the DOD, resulting in foregone receipts estimated at $150 million over the FY 2000-2002 period. Other major pay-as-you-go provisions offset some of these costs by authorizing the Secretary of the Navy to sell specific ships to certain foreign countries and authorizing the DOD to sell several materials contained in the National Defense Stockpile. The ship sales are estimated to increase receipts by $91 million in FY 2000 and the Stockpile sales are estimated to increase receipts by $202 million over five years. The Act also contains a number of retirement reform provisions with minor pay-as-you-go impact, yielding net costs estimated at $6 million over five years.

  6. CBO ESTIMATE:
  7. (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars)
    1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
    Net costs.................... 0 -97 -10 29 -25 -36

  8. EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OMB AND CBO ESTIMATES:
  9. The largest difference between OMB and CBO scoring is for the provision repealing the military retirement pay reduction in current law. OMB estimated the repeal would increase benefit payments, and therefore direct spending by $74 million per year starting in FY 2000. CBO interpreted the increase in spending as discretionary, because the provision ultimately requires contributions from discretionary military personnel accounts to pay for the actuarial costs of the Military Retirement Fund. OMB believes the repeal would have negligible impact on actuarial costs.

    Another significant scoring difference results from the provision reassigning spectrum frequencies to the Federal Government. OMB estimated the forgone spectrum auction receipts would cost $150 million over three years, but CBO estimated only a one time cost of $50 million in FY 2002. The difference is due to varying assumptions about the timing of the auctions and estimated receipts for the spectrum frequencies that were reclaimed for Federal use.

  10. CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUE LEGISLATION ENACTED TO DATE:
  11. (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars)
    1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
    Outlay effect.............. 53 730 1,061 681 906 18
    Receipt effect............ -5 3,659 1,779 769 1,985 37
    Net costs.................... 58 -2,929 -718 -88 -1,079 -19


Return to the OMB page

[Footer icon]

[White House icon] [Help Desk icon]